H100 SXM vs L40
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between NVIDIA H100 SXM and L40
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | H100 SXM | L40 | AMD Instinct MI210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Series | Data Center | - | Data Center |
| Architecture | Hopper | - | CDNA 2 |
| VRAM | 80GB | 48GB | 64GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3 | - | HBM2E |
| Memory Bandwidth | 3.4 TB/s | - | 1.6 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 134.0 | - | 181.0 |
| Tensor TFLOPS | 2.0k | - | 362.0 |
| TDP | 700W | - | 300W |
| Form Factor | SXM | - | - |
| Hardware Price | $$32k | - | - |
| Cloud Price (min) | $2.10/hr | $0.950/hr | - |
Related Comparisons
H100 SXM vs L40 FAQ
It depends on your use case. The H100 SXM offers 0% better performance (2.0k vs - TFLOPS). For raw performance, choose H100 SXM. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The H100 SXM has more VRAM with 80GB compared to 48GB (67% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the H100 SXM is generally better due to its larger VRAM (80GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 48GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
Price comparison requires both GPUs to have available pricing data. Check individual GPU pages for current market prices.
Upgrading to H100 SXM would give you 0% more performance and 67% more VRAM. Consider if your workloads are bottlenecked by current GPU capabilities.