MI300X vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between MI300X and NVIDIA H200 NVL
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | MI300X | NVIDIA H200 NVL | H200 | H100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | Data Center | - | Data Center | Data Center |
| Architecture | CDNA3 | - | Hopper | Hopper |
| VRAM | 192GB | 143GB | 141GB | 80GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3 | - | HBM3e | HBM3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 5.3 TB/s | - | 4.8 TB/s | 3.4 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 653.7 | - | 134.0 | 134.0 |
| Tensor TFLOPS | - | - | 2.0k | 2.0k |
| TDP | 750W | - | 700W | 700W |
| Form Factor | OAM | - | SXM | SXM |
| Hardware Price | $$18k | - | $$38k | $$32k |
| Cloud Price (min) | $2.39/hr | $3.39/hr | $2.30/hr | $1.47/hr |
Related Comparisons
MI300X vs NVIDIA H200 NVL FAQ
It depends on your use case. The MI300X offers 0% better performance (653.7 vs - TFLOPS). For raw performance, choose MI300X. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The MI300X has more VRAM with 192GB compared to 143GB (34% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the MI300X is generally better due to its larger VRAM (192GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 143GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
Price comparison requires both GPUs to have available pricing data. Check individual GPU pages for current market prices.
Upgrading to MI300X would give you 0% more performance and 34% more VRAM. Consider if your workloads are bottlenecked by current GPU capabilities.
