MI300X vs H200
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between MI300X and H200
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | MI300X | H200 | B200 | H100 NVL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | Data Center | Data Center | Data Center | Data Center |
| Architecture | CDNA3 | Hopper | Blackwell | Hopper |
| VRAM | 192GB | 141GB | 192GB | 94GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3 | HBM3e | HBM3e | HBM3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 5.3 TB/s | 4.8 TB/s | 8.0 TB/s | 3.9 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 653.7 | 134.0 | - | 134.0 |
| Tensor TFLOPS | - | 2.0k | 4.5k | 2.0k |
| TDP | 750W | 700W | 1000W | 400W |
| Form Factor | OAM | SXM | SXM | NVL |
| Hardware Price | $$18k | $$38k | $$45k | $$35k |
| Cloud Price (min) | $2.39/hr | $2.30/hr | $3.75/hr | $2.27/hr |
Related Comparisons
MI300X vs H200 FAQ
It depends on your use case. The H200 offers 203% better performance (2.0k vs 653.7 TFLOPS). However, the MI300X is 111% cheaper. For raw performance, choose H200. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The MI300X has more VRAM with 192GB compared to 141GB (36% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the MI300X is generally better due to its larger VRAM (192GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 141GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
The MI300X is 111% cheaper at $$18k vs $$38k. When considering performance per dollar, evaluate your specific workload requirements to determine the best value.
The H200 actually offers 203% better performance. An "upgrade" to MI300X would be a downgrade in raw performance, though it may offer other benefits like lower power consumption or cost.
