H100 NVL vs MI300
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between NVIDIA H100 NVL and AMD Instinct MI300
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | H100 NVL | MI300 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Series | Data Center | Data Center |
| Architecture | Hopper | CDNA3 |
| VRAM | 94GB | 128GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3 | HBM3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 3.9 TB/s | 5.3 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 134.0 | 490.3 |
| Tensor TFLOPS | 2.0k | - |
| TDP | 400W | 750W |
| Form Factor | NVL | OAM |
| Hardware Price | $$35k | $$15k |
| Cloud Price (min) | $1.38/hr | - |
Related Comparisons
H100 NVL vs MI300 FAQ
It depends on your use case. The H100 NVL offers 304% better performance (2.0k vs 490.3 TFLOPS). However, the MI300 is 133% cheaper. For raw performance, choose H100 NVL. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The MI300 has more VRAM with 128GB compared to 94GB (36% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the MI300 is generally better due to its larger VRAM (128GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 94GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
The MI300 is 133% cheaper at $$15k vs $$35k. When considering performance per dollar, evaluate your specific workload requirements to determine the best value.
Upgrading to H100 NVL would give you 304% more performance and similar VRAM. The upgrade cost difference is approximately $$20k. Consider if your workloads are bottlenecked by current GPU capabilities.