H200 vs MI355X
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between NVIDIA H200 SXM and AMD Instinct MI355X
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | H200 | MI355X | A100 40GB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Series | Data Center | Data Center | - |
| Architecture | Hopper | CDNA4 | - |
| VRAM | 141GB | 288GB | 320GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3e | HBM3e | - |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4.8 TB/s | 8.0 TB/s | - |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 134.0 | - | - |
| Tensor TFLOPS | 2.0k | - | - |
| TDP | 700W | 500W | - |
| Form Factor | SXM | OAM | - |
| Hardware Price | $$38k | $$25k | - |
| Cloud Price (min) | $2.30/hr | - | $3.40/hr |
Related Comparisons
H200 vs MI355X FAQ
It depends on your use case. The H200 offers 0% better performance (2.0k vs - TFLOPS). However, the MI355X is 52% cheaper. For raw performance, choose H200. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The MI355X has more VRAM with 288GB compared to 141GB (104% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the MI355X is generally better due to its larger VRAM (288GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 141GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
The MI355X is 52% cheaper at $$25k vs $$38k. When considering performance per dollar, evaluate your specific workload requirements to determine the best value.
Upgrading to H200 would give you 0% more performance and similar VRAM. The upgrade cost difference is approximately $$13k. Consider if your workloads are bottlenecked by current GPU capabilities.