H200 vs L40S
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between NVIDIA H200 SXM and NVIDIA L40S
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | H200 | L40S | AMD Instinct MI210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Series | Data Center | Data Center | Data Center |
| Architecture | Hopper | Ada Lovelace | CDNA 2 |
| VRAM | 141GB | 48GB | 64GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3e | GDDR6 | HBM2E |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4.8 TB/s | 864 GB/s | 1.6 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 134.0 | 183.0 | 181.0 |
| Tensor TFLOPS | 2.0k | 733.0 | 362.0 |
| TDP | 700W | 350W | 300W |
| Form Factor | SXM | PCIe | - |
| Hardware Price | $$38k | $$9.0k | - |
| Cloud Price (min) | $2.30/hr | $0.860/hr | - |
Related Comparisons
H200 vs L40S FAQ
It depends on your use case. The H200 offers 170% better performance (2.0k vs 733.0 TFLOPS). However, the L40S is 322% cheaper. For raw performance, choose H200. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The H200 has more VRAM with 141GB compared to 48GB (194% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the H200 is generally better due to its larger VRAM (141GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 48GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
The L40S is 322% cheaper at $$9.0k vs $$38k. When considering performance per dollar, evaluate your specific workload requirements to determine the best value.
Upgrading to H200 would give you 170% more performance and 194% more VRAM. The upgrade cost difference is approximately $$29k. Consider if your workloads are bottlenecked by current GPU capabilities.