H200 vs H100 SXM
Detailed comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing between NVIDIA H200 SXM and NVIDIA H100 SXM
Difference Analysis
Full Specifications
| Specification | H200 | H100 SXM | H100 NVL | A100 80GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | NVIDIA | NVIDIA | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | Data Center | Data Center | Data Center | Data Center |
| Architecture | Hopper | Hopper | Hopper | Ampere |
| VRAM | 141GB | 80GB | 94GB | 80GB |
| VRAM Type | HBM3e | HBM3 | HBM3 | HBM2e |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4.8 TB/s | 3.4 TB/s | 3.9 TB/s | 2.0 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 134.0 | 134.0 | 134.0 | 78.0 |
| Tensor TFLOPS | 2.0k | 2.0k | 2.0k | 312.0 |
| TDP | 700W | 700W | 400W | 400W |
| Form Factor | SXM | SXM | NVL | SXM |
| Hardware Price | $$38k | $$32k | $$35k | $$12k |
| Cloud Price (min) | $2.30/hr | $2.10/hr | $1.38/hr | $1.15/hr |
Related Comparisons
H200 vs H100 SXM FAQ
It depends on your use case. The H200 offers 0% better performance (2.0k vs 2.0k TFLOPS). However, the H100 SXM is 19% cheaper. For raw performance, choose H200. For value, consider your budget and workload requirements.
The H200 has more VRAM with 141GB compared to 80GB (76% more). More VRAM is crucial for training large models and running inference on bigger batch sizes.
For AI training, the H200 is generally better due to its larger VRAM (141GB). Large language models and deep learning workloads benefit significantly from more memory. However, if your models fit in 80GB, the cheaper option may be more cost-effective.
The H100 SXM is 19% cheaper at $$32k vs $$38k. When considering performance per dollar, evaluate your specific workload requirements to determine the best value.
Upgrading to H200 would give you 0% more performance and 76% more VRAM. The upgrade cost difference is approximately $$6.0k. Consider if your workloads are bottlenecked by current GPU capabilities.